Crowd-Source & Curated Progressive Pinoy Perspectives

Jennifer Antonio

Contributor

Currently not available

A humane version of the Public-Private Partnership

  • Aug. 17, 2011, 5:07 a.m.
  • = Responses

Here's a re-think of the Public-Private Program (PPP) the Philippines is so hot about in the past years. PPP is subject to a lot of controversy especially in the field of economics. Studies show that the majority of the risk is carried by tax-payers and not enough by corporations. If one of the P’s in the PPP was changed to ‘people’, things would change dramatically.

Deirdre White, president and CEO at CDC Development Solutions, a nonprofit that facilitates International Corporate Volunteer programs for IBM, Pfizer (to name a few) wrote an interesting article for the Stanford Social Innovation Review. Her version of PPP is when the government, corporations, and volunteers come together to adopt a pressing social issue. Below is an expert from the Stanford Social Innovation Review report:

 

Program Background

The volunteer project that sparked this partnership is IBM’s Corporate Service Corps, a program in which IBM sends select employees into emerging markets on short-term pro bono assignments to build capacity for international NGOs in areas such as IT, finance, marketing, human resources, and project management. In the case of Cross River, the Corporate Service Corps (CSC) teams were asked to assist in carrying out Projects HOPE and Comfort, a state-driven initiative designed to address the crisis.

Health data management was one of many challenges. Local clinics had no electronic database to track patient’s health and medical history. Rural women often sought medical care from roadside chemists and local birthing attendants—people they trusted but who were untrained in pre-natal and pediatric care. The CSC teams’ recommendations for addressing this problem included digital technology to monitor health trends and capture patients’ medical status, a communications plan to engender trust among a population unaccustomed to government support, and a change-management strategy designed to inspire both employees and community members to participate in the program.

Upon hearing the recommendations, Cross River’s Governor Liyel Imoke recognized the value of corporate expertise. Projects HOPE and Comfort have since evolved into a business partnership between IBM and Cross River State, grounded in the common goal of saving lives. IBM provides counsel on a biometric identification system that registers program participants, while giving hospitals and doctors the intelligence to make life-saving decisions. Solar panels have been installed in free health clinics that experience frequent power outages, and Projects HOPE and Comfort are on track to increase school attendance by 80% and reduce infant and mother mortality rate 50% by this year’s end.

Why Did This Cross-Sector Partnership Work?

I ask myself what is needed for government and business to innovate together to solve social challenges every day. In environments as diverse as Ghana, India, and the Philippines, my organization, CDC Development Solutions, works with corporations and their employee-volunteers to spur local social and economic development.

Several factors help explain the success of the IBM-Cross River State partnership:

1. Private sector support. The short-term Corporate Service Corps projects were a fertile learning ground that provided IBM with an understanding of Cross River’s cultural dynamics, while relationships with local communities and government organically developed. IBM’s senior leadership team well understands the value of this type of relationship. When C-Suite leaders understand the business value that accompanies a social contribution, this helps them to view it with a different lens and support the project.

2. Government committed to transparency. Cross River State’s Governor Imoke was a fervent supporter of the partnership. He demonstrated political will that went a long way in engendering the trust and cooperation of those beneath him, as well as transparency at all levels. 

3. Coordination and connection. When two parties with different languages and processes collaborate, the need for an intermediary cannot be underestimated. Working with a third party resource brings an on-the-ground network that fosters trust, while saving both parties a valuable resource: time. It also leads to results that can scale quickly, as we see in the case of Cross River.

4. Skills-based support. The engagements utilized the professional skills of employee volunteers from all over the world, bringing together a diversity of skills and perspectives. The projects were ones that required strategic thinking, not brute physical force. The team members were able to successfully apply their expertise to the tasks at hand.
 

This program can be easily adopted in the Philippines to address specific and timely concerns such as the quality of lack of public schools, health care access, reproductive health, skills and livelihood programs, and food scarcity. All that is needed to get the ball rolling is a platform where the discussions can take place for collaboration. This platform can be both online and offline and can facilitate support across seemingly unrelated industries. To all pro-active and progressive people reading this, get started.

Source: SSIReview
 
[Article image from cartoonstock.com]

Disclaimer: P3 is a crowd-sourced point-of-view and opinion platform to showcase viewpoints of diverse individuals. The claims, opinions, and statements of freelance contributing writers do not reflect the viewpoints and opinion of P3. P3 is a hub and collective space for bloggers, writers, and people with a cause of disseminating awareness on any topic they feel is worth spreading.

POSTED IN:
Perspectives
TAGS:

Comments